| | |  | |  |
MOVING AVERAGES 
Moving
averages are one of the most popular and easy to use tools available to
the technical analyst. They smooth a data series and make it easier to
spot trends, something that is especially helpful in volatile markets.
They also form the building blocks for many other technical indicators
and overlays.The two most popular types of moving averages are the Simple Moving Average (SMA) and the Exponential Moving Average (EMA). They are described in more detail below. Simple Moving Average (SMA) A
simple moving average is formed by computing the average (mean) price
of a security over a specified number of periods. While it is possible
to create moving averages from the Open, the High, and the Low data
points, most moving averages are created using the closing price. For
example: a 5-day simple moving average is calculated by adding the
closing prices for the last 5 days and dividing the total by 5. 
The calculation is repeated for each price bar on the chart. The averages are then joined to form a smooth curving line - the moving
average line. Continuing our example, if the next closing price in the
average is 15, then this new period would be added and the oldest day,
which is 10, would be dropped. The new 5-day simple moving average
would be calculated as follows: 
Over the last 2 days, the SMA moved from 12 to 13. As new days are added, the old days will be subtracted and the moving average will continue to move over time. In this example , using closing prices , day 10 is the first day possible to calculate a 10-day simple moving average. As the calculation continues, the newest day is added and the oldest day is subtracted. The 10-day SMA for day 11 is calculated by adding the prices of day 2 through day 11 and dividing by 10. The averaging process then moves on to the next day where the 10-day SMA for day 12 is calculated by adding the prices of day 3 through day 12 and dividing by 10.The chart above is a plot that contains the data sequence in the table. The simple moving average begins on day 10 and continues. This simple illustration highlights the fact that all moving averages are lagging indicators and will always be "behind" the price. The price is trending down, but the simple moving average, which is based on the previous 10 days of data, remains above the price. If the price were rising, the SMA would most likely be below. Because moving averages are lagging indicators, they fit in the category of trend following indicators. When prices are trending, moving averages work well. However, when prices are not trending, moving averages can give misleading signals.
Exponential Moving Average CalculationExponential Moving Averages can be specified in two ways - as a
percent-based EMA or as a period-based EMA. A percent-based EMA has a
percentage as its single parameter while a period-based EMA has a
parameter that represents the duration of the EMA. The formula for an exponential moving average is: EMA(current) = ( (Price(current) - EMA(prev) ) x Multiplier) + EMA(prev)
For a percentage-based EMA, "Multiplier" is equal to the EMA's specified percentage. For a period-based EMA, "Multiplier" is equal to 2 / (1 + N) where N is the specified number of periods. For example, a 10-period EMA's Multiplier is calculated like this: 
This means that a 10-period EMA is equivalent to an 18.18% EMA. Note: StockCharts.com only support period-based EMA's. Below
is a table with the results of an exponential moving average
calculation for Eastman Kodak. For the first period's exponential
moving average, the simple moving average was used as the previous
period's exponential moving average (yellow highlight for the 10th
period). From period 11 onward, the previous period's EMA was used. The
calculation in period 11 breaks down as follows: (C - P) = (61.33 - 63.682) = -2.352 (C - P) x K = -2.352 x .181818 = -0.4276 ((C - P) x K) + P = -0.4276 + 63.682 = 63.254 *The 10-period simple moving average is used for the first calculation only. After that the previous period's EMA is used.
Note
that, in theory, every previous closing price in the data set is used
in the calculation of each EMA that makes up the EMA line. While the
impact of older data points diminishes over time, it never fully
disappears. This is true regardless of the EMA's specified period. The
effects of older data diminish rapidly for shorter EMAs than for longer
ones but, again, they never completely disappear.
Simple Versus Exponential From afar, it would appear
that the difference between an exponential moving average and a simple
moving average is minimal. For this example, which uses only 20 trading
days, the difference is minimal, but a difference nonetheless. The
exponential moving average is consistently closer to the actual price.
On average, the EMA is 3/8 of a point closer to the actual price than
the SMA. Which moving average you use will depend on your trading and
investing style and preferences. The simple moving average obviously
has a lag, but the exponential moving average may be prone to quicker
breaks. Some traders prefer to use exponential moving averages for
shorter time periods to capture changes quicker. Some investors prefer
simple moving averages over long time periods to identify long-term
trend changes. In addition, much will depend on the individual security
in question. Moving average type and length of time will depend greatly
on the individual security and how it has reacted in the past. The
initial thought for some is that greater sensitivity and quicker
signals are bound to be beneficial. This is not always true and brings
up a great dilemma for the technical analyst: the trade off between
sensitivity and reliability. The more sensitive an indicator is, the
more signals that will be given. These signals may prove timely, but
with increased sensitivity comes an increase in false signals. The less
sensitive an indicator is, the fewer signals that will be given.
However, less sensitivity leads to fewer and more reliable signals.
Sometimes these signals can be late as well. For moving
averages, the same dilemma applies. Shorter moving averages will be
more sensitive and generate more signals. The EMA, which is generally
more sensitive than the SMA, will also be likely to generate more
signals. However, there will also be an increase in the number of false
signals and whipsaws.
Longer moving averages will move slower and generate fewer signals.
These signals will likely prove more reliable, but they also may come
late. Each investor or trader should experiment with different moving
average lengths and types to examine the trade-off between sensitivity
and signal reliability.
When to Use MA
Moving averages smooth out a data series and make it easier to identify
the direction of the trend. Because past price data is used to form
moving averages, they are considered lagging, or trend following,
indicators. Moving averages will not predict a change in trend, but
rather follow behind the current trend. Therefore, they are best suited
for trend identification and trend following purposes, not for
prediction.Because moving averages follow the trend, they work best when a
security is trending and are ineffective when a security moves in a
trading range. With this in mind, investors and traders should first
identify securities that display some trending characteristics before
attempting to analyze with moving averages. This process does not have
to be a scientific examination. Usually, a simple visual assessment of
the price chart can determine if a security exhibits characteristics of
trend.
In its simplest form, a security's price can be doing
only one of three things: trending up, trending down or trading in a
range. An uptrend is established when a security forms a series of
higher highs and higher lows. A downtrend is established when a
security forms a series of lower lows and lower highs. A trading range
is established if a security cannot establish an uptrend or downtrend.
If a security is in a trading range, an uptrend is started when the upper boundary of the range is broken and a downtrend begins when the lower boundary is broken.Once a security has been deemed to have enough characteristics of
trend, the next task will be to select the number of moving average
periods and type of moving average. The number of periods used in a
moving average will vary according to the security's volatility,
trendiness and personal preferences. The more volatility there is, the
more smoothing that will be required and hence the longer the moving
average. Stocks that do not exhibit strong characteristics of trend may
also require longer moving averages. There is no one set length, but
some of the more popular lengths include 21, 50, 89, 150 and 200 days
as well as 10, 30 and 40 weeks. Short-term traders may look for
evidence of 2-3 week trends with a 21-day moving average, while
longer-term investors may look for evidence of 3-4 month trends with a
40-week moving average. Trial and error is usually the best means for
finding the best length. Examine how the moving average fits with the
price data. If there are too many breaks, lengthen the moving average
to decrease its sensitivity. If the moving average is slow to react,
shorten the moving average to increase its sensitivity. In addition,
you may want to try using both simple and exponential moving averages.
Exponential moving averages are usually best for short-term situations
that require a responsive moving average. Simple moving averages work
well for longer-term situations that do not require a lot of
sensitivity. Uses for Moving Averages There are many uses for moving averages, but two basic uses stand out:- Trend identification/confirmation
The first trend identification technique uses the direction of the moving average to determine the trend. If the moving average is rising, the trend is considered up. If the moving average is declining, the trend is considered down. The direction of a moving average can be determined simply by looking at a plot of the moving average or by applying an indicator to the moving average. In either case, we would not want to act on every subtle change, but rather look at general directional movement and changes. The second technique for trend identification is price location. The location of the price relative to the moving average can be used to determine the basic trend. If the price is above the moving average, the trend is considered up. If the price is below the moving average, the trend is considered down.
The third technique for trend identification is based on the location of the shorter moving average relative to the longer moving average. If the shorter moving average is above the longer moving average, the trend is considered up. If the shorter moving average is below the longer moving average, the trend is considered down.
Support and Resistance level identification/confirmationAnother use of moving averages is to identify support and resistance levels. This is usually accomplished with one moving average and is based on historical precedent. As with trend identification, support and resistance level identification through moving averages works best in trending markets.
ConclusionsMoving averages can be effective tools to identify and confirm trend, identify support and resistance levels, and develop trading systems. However, traders and investors should learn to identify securities that are suitable for analysis with moving averages and how this analysis should be applied. Usually, an assessment can be made with a visual examination of the price chart, but sometimes it will require a more detailed approach. The advantages of using moving averages need to be weighed against the disadvantages. Moving averages are trend following, or lagging, indicators that will always be a step behind. This is not necessarily a bad thing though. After all, the trend is your friend and it is best to trade in the direction of the trend. Moving averages will help ensure that a trader is in line with the current trend. However, markets, stocks and securities spend a great deal of time in trading ranges, which render moving averages ineffective. Once in a trend, moving averages will keep you in, but also give late signals. Don't expect to get out at the top and in at the bottom using moving averages. As with most tools of technical analysis, moving averages should not be used on their own, but in conjunction with other tools that complement them. Using moving averages to confirm other indicators and analysis can greatly enhance technical analysis.
| |  | | | |